Let the words of my mouth and the meditations of all our hearts be acceptable in your sight, O Lord, our strength and our redeemer (Psalm 19:14).

Friday, November 30, 2012

Last Sunday after Pentecost - November 25

The Kingdom Yet to Come
Revelation 1:4b-8
John 18:33-37

When I was a student in seminary I was accused once of having a “realized eschatology.” There are undoubtedly worse taunts that are hurled about on the seminary playground… accusations of Pelagianism or other heresies. But it was a theology professor who commented on my “realized eschatology,” and it was said with a note of kindly criticism, suggesting that I might do well to explore a fuller or more balanced doctrine of eschatology.

To explain: Eschatology is that branch of theology that describes “last things.” The eschaton is the “final event in the divine plan. The end of the world.” The ultimately fulfillment of God’s plan. It is more than just an end; it is a completion, a fulfillment. The coming of God’s kingdom. Eschatology studies these subjects.

A realized eschatology holds that much of that divine plan is made real now… that we experience at least a significant portion of God’s plan now, here, in this world, in our daily lives. The kingdom is realized in our lives. We do not have to wait until the end of time to experience God’s fulfillment.

Today I want to try to express a more balanced view of eschatology. I want to talk about the kingdom that is yet to come. And maybe Professor Charlie Price, who now dwells in that kingdom beyond, will smile a bit.

The readings for this Last Sunday after Pentecost place the issues of eschatology and the Kingdom of God before us. The readings talk a lot about kings, earthly kings and heavenly kings. And, although it is not an official commemoration on the Episcopal calendar, today is informally known as Christ the King Sunday. We consider what it means to name Christ as King.

During his earthly ministry, Jesus does not seem to have described himself as the Messianic king. He clearly did not see himself as the political king many Jews at the time expected the Messiah to be. But Jesus does talk a lot about the kingdom, Gods kingdom. And Jesus says the kingdom is drawing near.

The kingdom drew near as Jesus drew near. As God incarnate, the kingdom dwelt within Jesus. He bore the kingdom within him. And as we, and others, draw near to Jesus we glimpse the kingdom through him. The kingdom is realized in our lives as we bring Jesus into our lives.

To go completely off script, I wonder if we see and know the Kingdom sort of like Bali Hai. This illustration will only work for those of you who know South Pacific.

Bali Ha'i may call you, Any night, any day,
In your heart, you'll hear it call you:
"Come away...Come away."

Bali Ha'i will whisper In the wind of the sea:
If you try, you'll find me
Where the sky meets the sea.

Someday you'll see me floatin' in the sunshine,
You'll hear me call you….
If you try, you'll find me
Where the sky meets the sea. 
You will hear. You will see. In your heart you will know. If you try, you will find me. In a way, we know the kingdom second hand if we know Jesus, and that is wondrous.

 But to know the kingdom first hand, to realize it, to experience it fully in our own lives, that is yet to come.

 The readings for today speak of God’s kingdom as beyond this world, beyond even time. Jesus says to Pilate, “My kingdom is not from this world.” And the Revelation readings refers to the Alpha and the Omega, the one who is and who was and who is to come… who is beyond time.

 If I asked you to describe God’s kingdom, what would you say? What do you think the Kingdom of God is like?

I read that across the ages, Christians have tended to describe the Kingdom through what they perceived as its antithesis in their own day… The kingdom is a place without slavery. The Kingdom is a place without poverty or hunger. The kingdom is a place without the dehumanizing power of multinational corporations. The kingdom is a place without war.

We have wonderful images of the kingdom from Scripture. The peaceable kingdom where, improbably and impossibly, the lion lies down with the lamb. There are Jesus’ kingdom parables. The sower, where the kingdom is a place that nurtures health and growth. The pearl of great price, where somehow the kingdom brings value into life. The mustard seed where the kingdom is a place of safety and inclusion.

Today’s collect reminds us that in the kingdom we are free from sin and all barriers that separate us are dissolved into reconciliation. So is the kingdom doable on earth? Can we as human beings achieve any of these manifestations of the kingdom? Even with God’s help, can we bring the kingdom near?

As Christians have thought about God’s kingdom there has always been a tension between the now and not yet. Between a yearning for the kingdom present now, and a vision of it yet to come.

Luther described the kingdom yet to come as the realm of divine grace. A place where everything (everything!) is suffused and governed by divine grace.

Those with a more realized eschatology have described the kingdom as a realm of ideal human relations. This world, perfected. And Christians have felt called to work to make that kingdom real, to do “kingdom work.” To work for social justice and the dignity of every person. Our baptismal covenant calls us to do this work as much as we are able.

But. But in the face of our repeated failure and despair to bring the kingdom fruition on earth; in the face of profound disagreements among Christians about what constitutes “kingdom work;” in the face of our inevitable slavery to selfishness, violence, and laziness… In the face of our inability to make God’s kingdom real, it is very good to remember Luther. To remember that the realm of divine grace is real. To remember that God’s kingdom yet to come, God’s kingdom brought to fullness and fruition by God, is absolutely real and lies ahead.

So maybe a balanced eschatology goes something like this: I am grateful for partial manifestations of God’s kingdom that are realized in this world, in my time. I am grateful for the glimpses I see that bring hope and assurance and renewed commitment to do kingdom work as best I’m able.

But, thanks and praise to God, this is not all there is. Let us joyfully and humbly remember that the fulfillment of Christ’s reign, promised to us, is better than all this. Better than this world around us. Even if we could fix everything in this world, the Kingdom of God is so much better than this. The glory of God’s hope for us, the glory of God’s plan for us, is so beyond our imagining, so beyond anything we could possibly create… The kingdom of glory not yet realized in our midst lies ahead.

Monday, November 26, 2012

Thanksgiving

Five Stages of Thankfulness 

At least in the era of modern psychology, it seems like everything is described in “stages.” There are the well-known five stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance. The psychologist Erik Erikson described human life as unfolding in stages of psychosocial development. They have fairly prosaic names like adolescence or middle adulthood. I was a bit interested to read that the defining conflict for middle adulthood, my current stage, is the conflict between generativity and stagnation.

If you google development stage theories, you’ll find listing of lots of other stages… stages of moral development, stages of spiritual development. There seems to be a development stage theory for everything in life.

 I am not an expert, but I think it’s accurate to say that all of these development stage theories are progressive. Human beings are perceived to progress, in order, from less mature or developed stages towards stages of greater maturity and sophistication. I imagine sometimes we get stuck or even backtrack a bit, but overall it’s a good thing to progress to higher and higher stages.

In this spirit of development stage theories, today I propose the five stages of thankfulness. It may be that some psychologist has written a dissertation on this or maybe there are a whole host of books on it, but I’m not aware of them. So these are my own, unscientifically constructed… Kristin’s five stages of thankfulness.

ONE. Stage one I call clueless. Clueless at least in the thankfulness department. Characterized by a sense of entitlement. What I have is mine. I deserve it. I have it. It’s mine.

TWO. Stage two is gratitude. I am grateful for what I have. It is conceivable that I might not have it. Perhaps I am aware of others who don’t have what I have and I am grateful. It seems to me that this stage is the primary focus of the thanksgiving holiday. To remind us to be grateful for what we have, to not take things for granted. Awakening gratitude is an important task. And, on the whole, I think most of us do pretty well. We are grateful.

THREE. Stage three takes gratitude one step further to what I call donor appreciation. Not only am I grateful for what I have, I am aware that someone gave me what I have and I am grateful to that donor. For example, not only am I grateful for the opportunities and freedoms I enjoy in this country, I am grateful to the wise and courageous founding fathers, who, in order to form a more perfect union, established this government and I grateful to soldiers and judges and citizens who preserve it. As Christians, aware of life’s blessings, we name God at this stage. We thank God for bestowing blessings upon us.

From clueless entitlement to an awareness of gratitude to thanksgiving for those who gifted us with good. Progress in the stages of thankfulness. It’s easy to stop at this point. But I have two more important stages of thankfulness. They both involve a response. A response from us.

FOUR. Stage four is giving thanks, expressing thanksgiving, returning thanks. Not just being thankful that you have a kind grandmother who gave you a really fabulous birthday present, but writing her a thank you note. Taking the time, the effort, the initiative to say thank you. Express thanksgiving. Offer prayer and praise to God in thanksgiving. Give voice to our thankfulness.

FIVE. Stage five is sharing. Sharing out of gratitude for what you have. And if you have anything to be thankful for, you have something to share. Not just giving out of a sense of obligation or responsibility or to meet a need, not that there’s anything wrong with that. But I’m thinking of sharing just for the sake of sharing. Because we can. Because we’re grateful. Because it’s a joyous way to participate in God’s own limitless generosity. Sharing seems to be the most spiritually mature, sophisticated stage of thankfulness. The stage that brings us closest to God. What are you thankful for? Warmth, love, creativity, friends, freedom, material abundance? All of these can be shared. Shared just out of joyful thankfulness that bubbles up and out into the world. Sharing as an expression of thankfulness.

Five stages of thankfulness. Stage one, a clueless absence, really, of thankfulness. Then gratitude, then an awareness of the donors and protectors of our gifts. And finally, our response. Expressing thanks, and ultimately, without reservation, in thanksgiving, sharing what we have been given with others.

May you know and share God’s blessings this Thanksgiving.

Friday, November 16, 2012

The Twenty-fourth Sunday after Pentecost - November 11

For People Like Us
Mark 12:38-44

The Gospel passage we heard this morning is relatively familiar. It’s the source of our English phrase, “a widow’s mite.” Jesus’ message seems pretty clear.

First, Jesus harshly condemns the scribes… those who use religious practice to make themselves feel good and look good. Long prayers and opulent robes are all about drawing attention to themselves, improving their status and wealth. They even devour widow’s houses for their own gain.

Moving on from his condemnation of the self-serving scribes, Jesus takes a seat in te treasury. The temple treasury. Evidently, many rich people put in lots of money. One commentary I read noted that they were probably tithing according to a complicated formula from an established tradition with significant deductions. Publicly meeting their pro forma obligation. Evidently there were a set of donations chests in the temple marked with the purpose for which the money would be used. So the donors could “control” or earmark their donations. In this passage, Jesus doesn’t actually condemn the rich donors, although he seems totally unimpressed.

In contrast, he lifts up the poor widow who puts in her two small copper coins, worth only a penny, but they are all she had to live on. Not all she could spare. Not all she had in her pocket that day. All she had to live on. And as a widow, she most likely did not have access to financial reserves or the ability to earn more.

Jesus commends her. It seems pretty clear. It’s funny, though, how we are able to ignore or rationalize our way around this passage.

As I was reading a bit about this passage this week, I discovered some interesting insights which provide an additional way to interpret what Jesus is saying. Not to disregard the familiar interpretation, but an additional message that Jesus may be conveying.

First: In Mark’s Gospel Jesus’ comments about the poor widow are the last thing he says in his public ministry before, pardon the phrase, all hell breaks loose. After this there are some apocalyptic pronouncements about the destruction of the temple and then the events of his passion. This is his last “normal” interaction with the people and his disciples. This is what the disciples are left with just as events begin to propel Jesus towards his crucifixion.

Second: Maybe this passage isn’t meant so much to answer the question: What are we supposed to do with our money? Maybe it’s meant to answer the question: Who is Jesus? Or who is the Messiah?

The Gospel passage we heard today begins a few verses earlier in Mark 12:35. Jesus begins teaching in the temple and he asks: “How can the scribes say that the Messiah is the son of David... When David himself calls him Lord?” Who is the Messiah? A literal son of David or something more? Lord of all.

So the passage we heard could be interpreted as a further exploration of the question, Who is the Messiah?

The Messiah certainly is not about fancy robes or long prayers just for show. He is not a puppet of the religious establishment, one who will fulfill the expectations or meet the needs of the Pharisees and scribes.

And then there is the poor widow. Who gives all she has to live on. And she gives it, think about it, to the temple! She gives all she has to the very people who are devouring the houses of widows. She gives her livelihood to people who are corrupt, self-serving, and hypocritical. It seems a reckless gift, sad and misguided. Yet Jesus lifts her up for all to see.

Perhaps this passage is an overture to Jesus’ passion. Like a traditional overture it introduces themes that will become even more important as the story unfolds. The widow’s gift foreshadows the one Jesus is about to make.

Can you see Jesus in this poor widow? Can you see her as a type for the Messiah? Jesus gives us this image to ponder. Can you see this poor widow on the cross? She gave up all she had to live on, her very life, on behalf of people who, at their best are indifferent to her. She gave all she had for people who, at their worst, devoured her for their own benefit. She gave up her life for selfish, corrupt, hypocritical scribes. People who surely did not deserve her gift and who would not use it well.

Apparently without any reservation she gave her life for people like us.